My other links

Archives of Kannada Radio Program
http://www.itsdiff.com/Kannada.html

(Kannada Songs, interviews with C Ashwath, PB Srinivas and more)


ರಸಿಕರ ರಾಜ್ಯ
For my Kannada blog please visit http://sampada.net/blog/rasikara-rajya

My first acting performance in a short movie (15 min): Please click here -> Kelade Nimageega - Short Movie

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Audio Recording of the Interview with Ratnamala Prakash on itsdiff.com



The links to the interview are now working.
Please listen to audio archive of my live interview with Rathnamala Prakash on Wed Dec 16. 7.00 AM to 7.40 AM PST(Caifornia). Rathnamala Prakash is a famous singer in Sugama Sangeeta. (Light music based on Poetry). KZSU 90.1 FM (Bay area). You can listen to future programs on the internet from anywhere in the world. For older Kannada programs and other language programs visit. http://www.itsdiff.com/Kannada.html

You can listen to the interview here.
Rathnamala Prakash Interview Please click here.

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Review: Kabaddi (Kannada Movie)

Dec 5 2009
Title: Kabaddi (2009)
Starring: All new people.
Director: Narendra Babu.

Score: 8 out of 10.

In my reviews I will only reveal what the movie is about. I do not want to spoil the movie for you.

My friends Ashita and Govardhan have combined their passion for Kannada movies and their entrepreneurial skills and have started screening Kannada movies frequently in the US. It is a good thing since nobody else is doing it and we get to see Kannada movies in spite of being far away from our native places. Tonight (Friday Dec 4th) was the first show of the new movie Kabaddi. Even though the movie runs through the weekend, Friday night is the best time to watch it. For one, Friday night is still nascent with the excitement of the coming weekend. Once we wake up tomorrow i.e Saturday morning it will be all down hill from then. It also brings back memories of watching 'Second Show' in Bangalore. So at 6.30 I called Ganesh, my friend since College and we both were there at 7.45. The movie was being screened in Sierra Theaters in Milpitas.

This a very new movie and is doing well in Karnataka now. It is a sports movie. It is about the Indian sport Kabaddi. The story is set in a small city - Mandya. A very dedicated and highly respected teacher called Guruji in the movie is building a Kabaddi team with the local college students - all aged less than 20. He and the team's sponsor Venkatesh - the local bigwig have the ambition of making it a high caliber team which would shine at the national level. Enter the Hero - Praveena a poor teenager. The affectionate Guruji sees in him a prospective Kabaddi star. But as it always happens in Indian movies Venkatesh conveniently has a sister who after the initial display of arrogance etc, promptly falls in love with him. So we have a poor boy and a rich girl, the girl's brother who does not like it and tries everything to stop it. Venkatesh is provided 2 thug like brothers. So taking care of Praveena is handled by the family. We are now in familiar territory. This boy-girl part adds the masala to this otherwise healthy movie. Since it is a sports movie, expect a lot of Kabaddi matches which are exciting to watch.

The movie is really well made. The director Narendra Babu has shown a lot of maturity, sense and restraint in developing this movie. The movie has a freshness about it which is really welcome in Kannada film world. For one, it is not a remake. Secondly and most importantly, all the actors are new comers. At least I did not know any of them except Avinash. They are all young, new and offer the viewers a chance to expect something unseen. They deliver it in good measure. All the actors have shown tremendous love and enthusiasm in the way they have portrayed their roles. Hamsalekha gives some good songs. I think he also plays one of the roles. The movie captures a lot of lively sequences involving the people, their life and their language and greenery in and around Mandya.


The unique thing about the movie is that it has an Arjuna Award winning Kabaddi player.

Overall it is a very good movie. It is very entertaining and very professionally made. Narendra Babu should be congratulated for a successful display of the art of movie making.

I do want to make a special mention. The guy who plays Guruji - he steals the show. He conveys a lot of emotions through his eyes and restrained acting. His acting is so dignified and subtle I feel it is one of the best performances I have seen recently.


I give it 8 out of 10.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Play Review: A Chrstmas Story

Dec 1 2009

Last Saturday on a whim, we decided to go to 'A Christmas Story' at the San Jose Repertory. We got a box seat where only the 4 of us could sit. At $119 for the family pack it was not bad.

The drama is about a boy's desire to get a Double Barrel Gun as a Christmas present. The story presentation is interesting with the elder version of the boy recollecting his childhood memories. We see the boy in the drama and the older version standing at the end of the stage. Similar to the trick we did in Namma Oorina Rasikaru. But we had Gorur in his older age only recollecting his village without him being a part in the recollection.

The stage setting and changes were made very efficiently. They had a turn table on which they had set up the inside of the house. When the table turned we could see the street view of the house. The main players were a working class father, homely mother, a 12 year old boy and his 7 year old brother. The drama was so well done that we were taken back to the 40s. The life of such a family, their simple and relaxed pace of life shows is what we missed.

The drama's main strength is the acting, sets and lighting. There is absolutely no music. So it was different from the Nut Cracker which was a ballet. But still this was worth it.

The bonus was that we got to see the Christmas in the Park in down town San Jose. The crowd was lean, the weather was warm and we were all not tired. I am glad we watched this show this Christmas season.

I give it a 8 out of 10.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Review: Death Proof (2007)

Title: Death Proof (2007)
Starring: Kurt Russel, Rose Mcgowan, Quentin Tarantino, Rosario Dawson, Zoe Bell,Sydney Tamia Poitier
Written and Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Director of Photography: Quentin Tarantino

Score: 6 out of 10

I was listening to NPR recently and I listened to Terry Gross's interview with Quentin Tarantino on Fresh Air. I was quite taken in by Tarantino's ideas, they way he conversed with Terry and his apparent passion for movies. He started out as an aspiring actor but at one point realized that he actually liked directing more and so started making the movies which have started a new genre. Terry Gross seemed very impressed with Tarantino's latest release 'The Inglorious Basterds" and listening to her description made me want to watch it. One of the impressive things I heard was that many lines from the movie 'The Reservoir Dogs' have become classics. I heard the one about naming different hit men in the movie with different colors. So before watching the latest movie I wanted to watch Tarantino's other movies and so I got Death Proof.

The movie starts off with three young women going off in a car to a lake side house. One of them is a radio show host who has made an announcement just that morning that her friend will give a lap dance to the guys who comes up to her and says the required lines. They go to a bar where Stuntman Mike (Kurt Russel) comes up to her and wins the lap dance. What starts off like a jolly conversation between girls ends up in a terror situation. Tarantino dishes out this Terror in his famous style including obscenities, blood and gore. What is quite enjoyable to watch is the breezy way Tarantino has captured the carefree life of the young women. We see a second part of the story where there are four other young women who encounter Stuntman Mike. I liked this second part more because the conversation between the women sounded more natural and fun. The stunt scenes on the rustic country side are very thrilling and quite believable.

Kurt Russel is quite menacing. The girls have a cheerful presence. Rosario Dawson's acting is a treat to watch. Tarantino himself has a cameo.

But what caught my attention most for the music. There are some spectacular and very unique tracks which remain in your mind for long. The theme song which is 'Chick Habit' by April May is really cool. The song 'Down In Mexico' by The Coasters is also very nostalgic and takes you to a music world which is starkly different from the music we hear everyday.

The movie was interesting to watch. I would not say there was anything that drew me in. It was like watching a video game. Dialogues and chase scenes and music stood out. But I did not get the same kick as I did when I watched Kill Bill Vol1 or Reservoir Dogs.

Score: 6 out of 10

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Review: Last Chance Harvey

Title: Last Chance Harvey
Starring: Dustin Hoffman, Emma Thomson, Josh Brolin
Written and Directed by: Joel Hopkins

Score: 7.5 out of 10.

I will start off with what comes to my mind when I want to write about this movie. Emma Thomson has a line in which she talks about what many people face but cannot say as succintly as her. "I am more comfortable with disappointments. In fact I wish for them". This says a lot about a person's spirits and the kind of treatment the young director Joel Hopkins gives his well crafted movie.

The movie is about Harvey who has one of most feared life situations - he is not making it big in his career, his family has left him, he is composing jingles for advertisements while all along wishes he was a Jazz Pianist and the worst thing is this - he thinks or perhaps knows that he is a mediocore composer. We find Harvey travelling to London to attend his daughter's wedding. We start liking Harvey early on during his flight to London. He tries to develop a conversation with a fellow passenger only to have that person politely shun it. We see Harvey is not offended but simply gives her the space. It seems like Harvey has a natural talent to make people hate him. It is this loveable character who goes to attend his daughter's wedding and learns that he will not be giving her away but instead her step father whom Harvey obviously hates will be giving her away. He does not want to stay for dinner. He decides to go back to NewYork. But it is here I will not reveal anything more except that Emma Thomson comes into his life. The way the relationship develops between Harvey and Kate (Thomson) is treated in a very natural and believable progression. It does not have flashy or in your face touches.

Dustin Hoffman and Emma Thomson give great performances. Emma Thomson an have a spring in her feat and dance away on the floor while immediately following it with a complex and dour performance. Hoffman is offcourse the experienced actor who is so controlled in his performance it reminded me of an acting tip I read recently about hand movement. A director is know to have said "You only get one hand movement in my drama. So be sure to use it at the right place". Dustin Hoffman does not do one extra muscle moment other than rekuired. Even at times when he has to show deep emotions he does it naturally and not in a way that says he is acting.

The director has done a good job of keeping the movie disciplined with out going for cliches and melodrama.

I give this movie a 7.5 out of 10.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Review: A Wednesday (Hindi)

2009 Sept 6th

Title: A Wednesday (Hindi)
Starring: Anupam Kher, Nasiruddin Shah,
Directed by: Neeraj Pande

Score: 7.5 out of 10

Here is yet another tightly spun movie with good police work, suspense and some excellent acting. Having Anupam Kher and Nasiruddin Shah in the lead leaves no doubt that the performance of these two veteran actors would be nothing but mature. The act of casting these two actors in the lead role itself shows that the director is doing something different. This is a movie which has conscisioslly shunned all the Bollywood Cliches and in the process bring along a freshness which the Hindi movie industry need in large doses. I cant help contrast this decent movie with that pathetic excuse for a crime thriller called "Gajini". While Gajini was utterly unbelievable, A Wednesday is very convincing. The realistic treatment given to it by the director ensure we take the movie, the roles and the director seriously.

The movie starts off with a phone call to the Mumbai Police headkuarters that bombs have been placed in a police station itself. The way the charceters are introduced sets up the story kuite well. The retired police chief Anupam Kher being brought a chair to sit on the beach side by a Police man shows how powerful he is. Similarly the director uses good tricks to play on the audience. What follows next is the negotiations between the Police chief and the terrorists about what is the give and take. This makes for an exciting movie.

It was nice to see that the Indian police atleast in Mumbai have at their disposal some sophisticated computers and other technology and they do use it to track down the terrorists. At the same time it is scary to see that Mumbai is such an attractive target for terrorists. The cops have to been always careful not to allow any slipups. It is reassuring to see that the Police department has excellent personnel who are ready to give their life for the sake of the country. They are decisive and responsible.

I liked this movie simply for its honesty and adherence to realistic portrayal. Anupam Kher and Nasiruddin Shah simple dominate the whole movie with their nuanced performance. Shah has some really juicy lines and he delivers them well.

The makers of this movie should be commended for their brave attempt. It is entertaining, fresh and well made.

I give it 7.5 out of 10.

Monday, July 27, 2009

Review: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Title: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (2009)
Starring: Daniel Radcliff, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Michael Gambon, Helena Bonham Carter, Tom Felton
Directed by: David Yates
Written by: J. K. Rowling
Screen Play: Steve Clove
Music: Nicholos Hooper
Director of Photography: Bruno Delbonnel

Score 6 out of 10.

Summary: Director David Yates: "oops..we are 3 minutes beyond our limit of two and a half hours...stop it and roll the credits. We will continue in the next installment".

Plot (I wont spoil it): Harry Potter and his mentors takes on the challenge of battling evil for the 6th time.

I was a bit of an anti-Potter since the first installment came some 7 year ago. I felt it got famous beyond what it deserved. I had felt that J.K Rowling was running away with so much fame just for creating a character which got propelled by good marketing and a crowd that jumped on the bandwagon. Not withstanding my contempt, the movie franchise is turning out to be a money machine. Now the latest installment -the 6th one - is alleged to have made more money than the reigning champion 'Batman The Dark Knight' for an opening day.

But I had became a convert when I watched the 4th in the series (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire). I must admit I was also influenced when when 'The Hindu' newspaper known for its balance and restraint wrote an editorial extolling the virtues of this franchise and praising it for giving children a magical story rich with imagination. Having watched most of the movie on DVD, me and my wife thought that this was a good movie to be watched on the big screen and we drove ourselves with the kid last Friday night for a 9.30 show at the AMC in Valco Mall, Cupertino. The bright neon sign on Wolfe road bearing the AMC name brings an atmosphere of yesteryear Hollywood... but I digress.

Although the dark atmosphere of Hogwarts, the flame lit halls of the temple of education majoring in magic and some of more-sinister-looking-than-the-bad-guy Professors can be interesting, it gets tiring after more than a few repeat productions. In fact I got so bored in this movie that when the movie ended abruptly, I found myself feeling relieved that the heavy stuff came to an end.

Having gone in thinking I will watch a magical fun film which gives shape to the imagination of children (of all ages) I kept waiting for it. Most of the story was about dark concepts in life like evil and death and people in the University of Magic seemed immensely serious about looking gloomy and sinister themselves.

In fairness the movie does have excellent visuals, settings and special effects. The locales are beautiful. But they all seem to aid this quest for exploring darkness. The usual suspects in the Potter franchise are here too - complete with their "it-may-look-clumsy but this is the costume I wear always".

The plot involves a character called The half blood Prince. The protagonist Harry Potter seems to be a passenger in a journey along with the bearded sage Prof. Dumbledore and others on the good side who are battling the dark side led by a character called Draco (played well by Tom Felton) with his own band of evil guys. Potter (Radcliffe) still remains a kid and does give a dignified performance. I was impressed by Prof. Slughorn played by Jim Broadbent - a performance which is brilliantly idiosyncratic.

In spite of its great box records I feel Harry Potter and The Half Blood Prince falls way short of deserving the attention and accolades it is getting. The biggest letdown was the ending. It leaves you feeling that the director suddenly realized "oops..we are 3 minuted beyond our limit of two and a half hours...stop it and roll the credits. We will continue in the next installment".

I rate it as 6 out of 10

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Review: The Duchess (2008)

Title: The Duchess (2008)
Starring: Keira Nightly, Ralph Fiennes, Charlotte Ramping, Dominic Cooper,
Directed by: Saul Dibb
Written by: Jeffrey Hatcher (screenplay) and Anders Thomas Jensen (screenplay) ...
Story: Amanda Foreman (Georgiana The Duchess of Devonshire)
Music: Rachel Portman
Director of photography: Gyula Pados

Score: 7 out of 10

I wanted to watch this movie since it was being talked about during the awards season. It won the Best Achievement in Costume Design for Michael O'Connor.

This is a movie about Georgiana who is the daughter of royal family. She is a young and peppy girl. She is playful and we see her having clean fun with other young women and some young men. Such a girl gets sucked into a reluctant wedding. She gets engaged to Duke of Devonshire who is a a middle aged man but more importantly a man with a constipated sense of self and not a bit fun. When G's mom tells her "I heard a rumor that I will be addressing you as Her Grace the Duchess of Devonshire" her response is "But does he love me". This statement basically tells that G would at least be happy with a loving husband. But as the story progresses we get to see more and more of the Duke's serious nature. Over the years they become parents to 2 daughters. G is such a noble soul that she takes in an orphan daughter fathered by the Duke with a maid.

But the Duke gets more and more upset that they are not having a Son. This turns into anger against G and eventually another woman steps in with her 3 sons and starts living with the Duke. I will not tell more of the plot.

The movie itself is very well conceived. Acting by Keira Nightly and Ralph Fiennes is a treat to watch. I enjoyed Ralph Fiennes acting for his very studied performance in portraying the complicated character of the Duke of Devonshire. The Duke seems to have a mix of traits like a sense of self which is undeserving except for the fact that he was born into royalty. He also hides a sense of shame for not being able to Sire a son. And at certain times he even tries to be apologetic of his rude behavior. Mr. Fiennes handles all this with aplomb. Ms Nightly should be credited for a good performance. The movie is engaging and is a good display of acting and period setting. The music and photography add to enhance the effect of the movie.

The movie looks closely into the life of Duchess Georgiana who was one of the earliest female politicians who used her charms to move the people. It is interesting to see that England had a parliament and opposition leaders and elections as far back as late 1700s.

I give this movie a 7 out of 10

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Review: Shiver

Title: Shiver (Original Spanish Title Escalofrio)
Starring: Junio Valverde,Blanca Suarez
Director: lsidro Ortiz
Written by: Jose Gamo
Music: Fernando Velasquez
Director of Photography: Josef M Civit

Score: 7.5/10

In recent days I had been watching the Oscar circuit movies. So a good scary thriller was what I needed. Netflix had this Spanish movie Shiver for instant watching. It was really Worthy watching.

The story involves a teenage boy Santi have a nightmare in which, as he comes to Sunlight he gets burnt. The boy has a medical condition called Photo-phobia which makes him extremely sensitive to sunlight. So the doctor advises his mom to move to nearby country side which is thickly vegetated and surrounding by towering mountains. Santi and his mom move to the country side.

They rent a house and as the story progresses we get introduced to various segments of country life. Even though it is sparsely populated there is school, cell phone works and there are also quaint village grocery store locate on cobbled streets. But all these beautiful environment starts revealing a scary underbelly. It starts with a Sheep being killed. It is not just a horrible killing. Somebody has sucked blood out of the animal. Then as the story progresses we encounter a few more gory murders and blood being sucked out of the bodies. This times it is a boy who is the victim. In addition to all there is weird noises and strange happenings in Santi's house. The story proceeds relentlessly revealing little by little. What makes the movie a thrill to watch is the thick jungle setting where the murders happen.

I will not reveal any more here. One should watch the movie for the thrill as well as for the abundantly interesting Spanish country side. I never felt that people were acting. It looked like we were having a front seat view of crime in a village,

The director combines many movie making and story telling techniques. It is a mind bending experience. Two people who watch the movie can have different understanding of what happened. As is usual with murder mysteries there are situations which lead the viewer in the wrong direction but the director maturely handles it so that it does not become just a trick. There is a real reason why the viewer got distracted.

SPOILER FOLLOWS - STOP READING NOW IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO KNOW A KEY REVELATION.





This movie reminded me of Spyder by David Cronenberg starring Ralph Feinnes. What we see may not be the truth at all. The director can employ tricks to mislead the viewer while still being truthful. Since I had watched Spyder I was somehow able to guess the secret. But its possible there is a different interpretations.


I was entertained by this movie.

I give it 7.5 out of 10

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Review: The Wrestler

Review: The WrestlerSunday, July 5, 2009 10:42 PM
Title: The Wrestler
Starring: Mickey Rourke, Marrissa Tomei, Evan Rachael Wood
Directed by: Darren Arnofsky
Written by: Robert D Seigel

Having totally agreed with the choice of Sean Penn for the best acting award in Milk, I was curious to see Mickey Rourke's performance because he beat Penn to the Golden Globe acting award. The sight of him in the Golden Globe ceremony with chains had left me wondering what kind of a character was the Wrestler if Mickey Rourke did well. In all fairness Mickey has given truly nuanced performance. The story is about a proffesional wrestler Randy The Ram who is feeling lonely inspite of his celebtrity in the WWF circuits. He befriends Cassidy ( Marissa Tomei) who is an exotic dancer. She suggest that he should reconnect with his estranged daughter (Evan Rachael Wood). How this turns out is the movie. The story itself does not have much twists or turns. But there are many situations which are emotional. The director aided by Rourke have created some very nice and tender moments. Infact what stands out in the movie is the bonhomie between opposing wrestlers who band togethar like a family outside of the ring. There are some nice scenes invloving the interactions between the wrestlers. Inspite of all their bravado, the WWF wrestlers seem to have a tender heart and have the same ups and downs as the rest of us.

It is a well directed and acted movie. But it does not have a very complicated story to tell. For that reason it is difficult to appreicate the movie beyond "well done".

Score: 6 out of 10

Review: Revolutionary Road

Title: Revolutionary Road
Starring: Leonardo De Caprio, Kate Winslet, Kathy Bates, Michael Shannon
Directed by: Sam Mendes
Original Novel: Revolutionary Road by Richard Yates.
Screenplay Written by: Justin Haythe
Music: Thomas Newman
Director of Photography: Roger Deakins

Score: 7.3 out of 10

There is a very evocative piece of music which keeps coming up through out the movie. I guess it is like the central characters Frank and April keep getting into their disappointments because they see their life is empty and hopeless. This mind you with a typical American middle class family. The couple have all the material comforts they need. They have a nice house in the suburbia, 2 little children, a handsome husband and a wonderful wife. Beneath this trankuil surface there is emptiness and hopelessness.

The movie high lights the plight of people who have a certain vague dream and they do not celebrate their everyday success because they are waiting for the dream to come true. In the movie, the couple get married with one such dream - which we never come to know clearly in the movie. That is good. In real life too we are prone to be running after something which is very nebulous and abstract and feel very disappointed when that exact expectation does not materialize.

The highlight of the movie is definitely the screen play by Justin Haythe. Based on a 50s novel by Richard Yates by the same name, the film is replete with many complex scenes which explore the nature of the relationship between Frank and April. It is shot in closeup. These scenes reveal about the lead characters in an helps a picture of the character evolve in our minds. Leo and Kate's acting brings out the scenes spectacularly. The general aura of the film brings back the 50s America when the post war prosperity can be seen but the movie paints a picture of homogeneity suggesting that this prosperity is not deep.

The director Sam Mendes and the director of Photography Roger Deakins and the music director Thomas Newman get credit for bringing the audience closer and closer to the world between Frank and April. I think Kate Winslet's performance in this movie is far better than her role in the Reader for which she got the oscars.

I give the movie 7.3 out of 10

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Radio Program: Interview with Dr. Veena Shantheshwara

Radio program to mark the Centennial celebration of women writers in modern Kannada literature.

It was 100 years ago in 1909 that Santu Bai Neelagaara became the first women writer of modern Kannada literature. Her first novel 'Sadguni Krishna Bai" laid the foundation for future generation of women writers in Kannada and called for rational awakening of the women's world and for women's education. To mark this occasion there will be a live interview with Dr. Veena Shantheshwara who is a well known progressive writer in Kannada. Click below to know about Dr. Veena Shantheshwara

http://tinyurl.com/n4blp8


You are invited to call in and share with others your thoughts and questions.

Date: Thursday June 11
Time: (California Time)
6.00 AM to 7.30 AM PST - Regular program with music
7.30 AM to 9.00 AM PST - Special program and Interview with Dr. Veena Shantheshwara

Radio: Stanford 90.1 FM KZSU. (California Bay area)
Internet: http://kzsulive.stanford.edu/ (from anywhere in the world)
Host: Madhu Krishnamurthy

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Movie Review: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

2009 May 18

Title: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)
Nominated for 13 Oscars. Won three.
Lost out to Slum Dog Millionire in major categories including best picture.

Starring: Brad Pitt, Taraji P Henson, Kate Blanchett, Julia Ormond, Elias Kuotaes
Directed by: David Fincher
Written by: Eric Roth and Robin Swicord
Music: Alesandre Desplat
Makeup: A big team lead by Greg Canom (Oscar)
Director of Photography Claudio Miranda
Art Direction: Donald Graham Burt and Set Decorator: Victor J Zalfo ( Joint OSCAR AWARD Best Acheivement in Art Direction)
Visual Effects: Team of four. (Oscar)
Rating: PG 13

Score: 6 out of 10

Having been a favorite at the Oscars along with Slum Dog Millionaire, this movie has a really fascinating story line. The story starts of with Kate Blanchett as an old and frail woman who is expecting to die shortly. She asks her daughter to read a diary the narration of which is the story. At the heart of the story is the thought of what would happen if we were able to reverse the march of time. To underscore this angle the movie starts of with the installation of a clock which runs backwards.

The story has at its begging the birth of Benjamin into the Button family which owns the hugely profitable Button company. Benjamin as new born has an ugly face and the family members find his look reprehensible. Adding to this woe the mother dies due to complications during birth. Mr Button is so furious that he tries to kill the child but ends up leaving it in the care Queenie (Taraji) who is taking care of elderly people in a nursing home. Queenie is happy that she found a new born baby and names him Benjamin.

There is some heart warming but incredulous developments here. When Taraji and every one discovers the baby has the face of really really old man, it is odd that they do not have some kind of fear of it. I can understand feeling love for a baby that is deformed or is unfortunate to be thought of unattractive. But an old man in the shape of a baby is a scary and weird happening which needs some display of horror. The fact that I did not see this a bit less unnatural. I am not questioning the old man baby syndrome but the reaction of the people around the phenomenon.

I guess there is some strong meta physical meaning to the fact that an old man is born and start growing younger and younger while other children grow older older. The very obvious thought that comes to mind is the universal desire to not grow old. The movie get more aggressive in talking about not only not growing old but in fact growing younger. Obviously you have to be old in order to show that your getting younger. So baby had to be born as an old man. This is odd. It would have been interesting to see what would be the story if Benjamin was born normally, grew old and then started growing younger.

The phenomenon of Benjamin growing younger down to marriageable age and a little girl Daisy (Kate Blanchett) growing up to be of a marriageable age and meeting half way is interesting. It is interesting how both Benjamin and Daisy loose their innocence on the way. Benjamin goes to sea and experience his initiation into adult life including romance, sex, war and camaraderie. Daisy experiences the same by going to New york to become a ballet dancer. It is the meeting of these two souls which throws up some interesting drama.

I guess what the films shows if not intentionally is that growing young is not pleasant. On the contrary it is a very stressful experience. It is interesting to see where Benjamin is heading as he gets younger. Kate Blanchett's character on the other hand is growing old in the natural way and it appears that this natural process of getting is in fact quite beautiful though apparently dreaded by humanity.


The movie begin with a a woman giving birth to a OLD man baby and ends with Baby old man. The whole story is narrated by a young woman who is growing up normally to a dying mother.


All these make for a fascinating story. There is some quite believable make up wizardry that helps to show Brad Pitt going through different stages of life. Good acting by Kate Blanchett. But that is all I took from this movie. I did not find the movie neither high on entertaining nor did I have a learning experience. So I am even surprised that it got as many as 13 Oscar nominations. Apart from making Brad Pitt look like a baby-that-looks-old or an old-man-that-looks-like-a-baby I do not see any film making artistry in play here. And the movie was long too, crossing 2 hours 17 minutes.

Now I think that it was only justifiable that Slum Dog swept the Oscars.

I give this movie a 6 out of 10.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Kannada Sahitya Goshti program on May 16.

Panel discussion on 'ondu haley chaddi' written by Mogalli Ganesh.

You can listen to the story 'ondu hale chaddi' read by Madhu here.


Here is a very good sounding board to bring up some good discussion on social issues, writing style, character development and use of language

This Saturday we will be having a very interesting discussion on MogaLLi Ganesh's short story oMdu haLe ceDDi. The story is a vivid depiction of life, its ups and downs and customs of the invisible majority of India.

A panel of 6 members will discuss this story and share what goes on in their mind when they read this story or hear others discuss it.

Program details:
Date : May 16th 2009, Saturday
Time : 2:00 to 4:30 PM
Place: Community Room, Los Altos Library
13 S. San Antonio Road
Los Altos CA 94022

Panel:
Suresh Babu
Ravi Gopal Rao
Vishvanath Hulikal
Ganesh Kadaba
Prabhu Murthy
Prakash Nayak

Moderator:
Madhu Krishnamurthy

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Review: Vicky Cristina Barcelona

2009 May 12 Title: Vicky Christina Barcelona (2008)
Starring: Javier Bardem, Scarlett Johansson, Penelope Cruz, Rebbecca Hall
Written and Directed by: Woody Allen

Score: 7.6 out of 10

Woody Alan the master American director explores the human desire for fulfillment in his latest movie. Two friends Scarlett Johansson and Rebbecca Hall move to Barcelona, Spain. Vicky is there to study about Spanish culture while Christina is there to spend the summer. They are introduced to a local painter Antonio who is lately estranged from his wife and is rumored that she tried to kill him On an afternoon Javier meets the 2 ladies and asks them to join him on a private flight to a nearby vacation spot. By way of enticing them he says very casually that the two women are beautiful, they could do some art, all three can have good wine, food and go to bed together. Vicky is shocked to hear this innovative pick up line but Christina is so enamored by the brashness and celebrity of the painter (Bardem) that she is eager to go. She thinks he is interesting .

It should be mentioned here that she has just ended her umpteenth relationship and is always on the look out for a new relationship. Vicky considers her an idiot and is almost protective of her. But Christina is so hungry for romance and that 'perfect man' she convinces Vicky to go with her.

What follows is a serious look at the lives of people who do not fit the model of a 'normal' everyday human being. Vicky is there as the normal everyday person to contrast Christina. But Woody Alan is such a master of human mind games that he has served up a beautiful movie, well acted and off course funny in a wry sort of way.

The movie uses music, art, food, familial relationships and the bohemian feel of Spanish Europe to navigate through the labyrinth of human mind. As we wade through the murky, dark, dull and unexpected turns and twists inside this labyrinth we come across emotions and reactions from the characters which are unexpected but understandable at the same time. The characters have fears, confusion, greed and lust. All of which makes us like the characters.

What the movie succeeds to do is to take us through the upheavals of the characters, show us the roller coaster ride they go through and make us realize that our minds and lives are in fact a roller coaster. But at the end of the movie I felt that the roller coaster ride is protected by the cushion of human behavior and bonds.


All the leading actors have giving beautiful and natural performance. I found Xavier Bardem's character to be very likable. It is to his credit that he makes it likable despite the traits of the character. Penelope Cruz shows that she needs to be take seriously. Scarlett is now a seasoned actress and she does great without stealing the show which is the hall mark of good actor. But for me the memorable character was Vicky played by the English actor Rebbecca Hall who had notable roles in The Prestige and Frost/Nixon. She displays so many emotions in her eyes, especially in the last scene that it is hard not be swayed.

Woody Alan is simply coasting along giving movies after good movies. The music adds to the color and artistry seen in the visuals with Spain's beautiful vineyards, country side and life in general showing elegance in every turn. Photography and Art Direction have done a great job in lifting up this movie to a higher plane.

This movie gets 7.5 out of 10

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Review: The Reader

2009 May 6

Title: The Reader
Starring: Ralph Fiennes, David Cross, Kate Winslet
Directed by: Stephen Daldry
Written by:David Hare and Bernard Schnik

5.5 out of 10

I waited for 10 days before I got a chance to watch this movie. I started to watch it having decided that I may not be able to watch it fully in one sitting. I watched in 3 sittings being interrupted by my 3 year old Daughter a couple of times

I was under the impression this was a violent movie and had some blood in it. It was not. The story is set in various time periods mostly in Germany. We start with the current time which is mid nineties and see the character of Michael Berg played by Ralph Feinnes. As Michael reminisces on his life we see his past unfold in front of eyes. We are taking back to early 1950s when Germany had come out of the fascist Nazi rule. We see a torrid love affair develop between Michael who is then a 15 year old boy and a middle aged woman Hannah Schmitz played by Kate Winslet. The atmosphere is very well set to take us back to those days. But what follows does not seem to add up to a compellingly told story. The whole movie during this part seems to be about Michael's affair with Hannah and adds little value to the development of the story. The scenes are plain raw and does not have much subtle characterization except for when Michael and Hannah go on a picnic. We see Hannah break down during a Church coir which has shades of meaning associated with it.

Amidst scenes of Michael growing up and getting a law degree we see flashbacks to different time periods. Much to the credit of the director the non linear narration seems to gel smoothly with the story. Ralph Fiennes has given a studied performance. The big disappointment came from Kate Winslet for her role as Hannah Schmitz. She does not have much to work with, in her role. Her performance pales in comparison with those of Angelina Jolie in Changeling and Sally Hawkins - the heroine in Happy go Lucky, as well as Mellisa Leo the heroine in Frozen River. As an aside I wonder how they get around the fact that the leading character is a minor and has been asked to act in mature scenes.


Still this did not interest me beyond the curiousity about Kate Winslet's performance which received the Oscar for the best female lead in acting.

The music is haunting. Nice photography. Good acting and a good story. But I did not find it strong enough.

So I give this movie 5.5 out of 10

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Three hour Kannada Radio Program in Sunday May 3

Americada neladalli Kannadada kampu.

We are seeing an increase in Kannada activities in the US. This includes literary and cultural programs. Here is a Radio program to highlight these activities.

Please listen to a special Kannada Radio Program featuring interviews with Kannada writers and acitivists in America.

If you are involved in any Kannada activity we are eager to hear from you. Please give us a call during the program and share your accomplishments with the rest of the world. That is right. Since this program is broadcast on the internet we have listeners from all over the world.

Let us fill the air with Kannada kalarava and music for 3 hours on this Sunday afternoon.

Americada neladalli kannadada kampu

Date: Sunday May 3rd
Time: 3.00 PM to 6.00 PM PST (California Time)
Radio: Stanford 90.1 FM KZSU. (California Bay area)
Internet: http://kzsulive.stanford.edu/ (from anywhere in the world)
(Depending on your internet speed Click on 56k stereo MP3 or 128K Stereo MP3 )
Phone Number to call during the program: 650 723 9010.
Please call this number ONLY during the program.

This program starts as soon as the preceeding baseball game ends. So if you hear baseball commentary please wait till it ends and the Kannada program starts.

Old Kannada programs at http://www.itsdiff.com/Kannada.html

My Kannada Blog:
http://sampada.net/blog/rasikara-rajya

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Review: Milk

2009 April 15

Title: Milk
Starring: Sean Penn, Josh Brolin, Emile Hirsch, James Franco
Written by: Dustin Lance Black.
Directed by: Gus Van Sant
Photography: Harris Savides
Art: Charley Beal
Music: Danny Elfman
Editor:Elliot Graham
Score: 8 out of 10

This movie is all about Harvey Milk who was the Gay rights activist in the 70s in the San Francisco area. Sean Penn who plays Milk makes this movie all about his performance. True to the movie title the director Gus Van Sant ensures that this movie is an intimate account of Milk's private and public lives. This was a story written by Dustin Lance Black who suffered due to discrimination in Dallas due to his sexual preference.

In the years before the 70s, the rights of homo sexuals were always being questioned by the so called moral police. Actually it was worse. They were being harassed and beaten up by police in no less a city than San Francisco. Into this scene enters Harvey Milk and his partner Scott. They set up a camera shop on Castro and openly exhibit their gayness. The store quickly becomes a place for the gays to hand out. With tenacity, Milk fights against injustices to gays and after four or five attempts wins an election to the office of City Supervisor becoming the first openly gay person to occupy a public office in the US.

Being a biopic the movie has a documentary feel to it. In this sense the movie does not have an emotional narrative. It seems to be a collection of historical events. But that does not take away the credit from this movie or its makers. The locales and the costumes have been recreated so well that it transplants the viewer to the 70s San Francisco. Sean Penn does not remind you of Sean Penn at all. Sean Penn the actor has disappeared inside the character Milk so completely that we do not even feel he is acting. His body language, his expressions and his way of speaking are great testimonies to this actors ability. Having always seen Sean Penn as an unlikeable snob this movie surprises his detractors with his charming mannerisms. This perhaps is Sean Penn's finest performance. He rightly won the Oscar for best male performance.

While this movie is about Gay rights what is very striking is the thrill of seeing an underdog -individual or a group of people - organizing themselves and mobilizing a mass movement which becomes successful. The movie lays bare in front of us the situation and we cannot help cheering Milk and his group of interesting friends. There are such interesting characters as Scott (James Franco), Jack (Diego Luna), Cleve (Emile), Anne Kronenberg(Allison Pill). The movie is successful in bringing out these characters to life, complete with flesh and blood. The movie ends with a nice touch. We see the real surviving characters come and speak about Milk.

Josh Brolin (American Gangster and No Country for Old Men) is striking in his dignified performance as Dan White, a gay hating conservative City Supervisor. What could have been a caricature has been turned into an understated performance while still being able to show his rage resulting from feeling humiliated. He was nominated for Best Supporting actor at the Oscars. The award went to Heath Ledger in Batman. Scott, played by James Franco is good too.

The movie is tightly edited. The grainy feel of the film and the hairstyles take us to those days. This movie was inspired by The Times of Milk (1984) by Rob Epstein. Gus Van Sant wanted to make this movie in spite of not being the first one. His love for the theme and Harvey Milk shows in the making of this movie. There is a short glimpse of the real Milk who comes of as a genuinely concerned activist. He did not fight just for the gays. His life is inspiring for other minorities like Asians, Black and Latinos.

This movie gets 8 out of 10.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Movie Review: Rachael Getting Married

2009 April 08

Title: Rachael Getting Married (2008)
Starring: Anne Hathaway
Directed by: Johnathon Demme
Written by: Jenny Lumet
Music: Declan Quinn
Photography:David Harrison Jr. and Zafar Tavaii
Score: 7.5 out of 10

This Oscar year seems to have the theme of a recluse trying to fit back into her family or the the world in general. Rachael getting married is a poignant look at a recovering drug addict Kimmy played beautifully by Anne Hathaway. The sibling rivalry between Kimmy and her sister Rachael comes into sharp focus during the preparations for Rachael's wedding. Kimmy comes back home and is trying to fit in. In between rehab sessions for Kimmy we see how old wounds between the sisters start becoming important and developing into a major road friction point between them. In a brilliantly written script (Jenny Lumet ) we see a very real and human dynamics going on in the family. The highlight of the script is how it has used many incidents to give us a complete picture of each character.

Kimmy is simply one of the most beautiful roles I have seen. This character makes us like her even more than the role played by Kirsten Scott Thomas in I have loved so long. Initially I thought Kimmy was the older sister but in what is an amazing performance Anne Hathaway starts making her character look like a little girl. All this is accomplished by her subtle reactions and looks. It is very refreshing to see such an exquisite performance even when there was a chance for melodrama. The script writer has developed the screen play so intricately that one does not realize that the story is not very complicated. It is how the characters behave in more of less everyday situations.

There are some heart warming scenes of bonhomie between the black and white race. One is not surprised because the people involved are liberals and intellectuals from Connecticut. The theme for Rachael's wedding is Indian - they all wear sarees and eat Aloo 'Gaabi'.

The actor who played Rachael (Rosemary Dewitt ) is quite good. She brings a sunniness to her character which interestingly is not very likable. The father played by Bill Irvine has displayed the helplessness of the father a bit too much... but that I guess is his character.

The photography uses bright tones making the atmosphere look artificially bright and sunny while its not - at least not to Kimmy. Jonathan Demme handles his story in a very disciplined way without giving in to melodramatic elements.

Anne Hathaway was nominated for the best actor role which eventually went to Kate Winslet for Reader. Since I have not seen Reader, I will wait to compare Anne Hathaway's performance with Kate's.

This movie scores 7.5 out of 10.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Kannada Radio Program on Stanford Radio and internet on April 1

Kannada Program about 'Money and Economy' on Stanford Radio 90.1 FM KZSU

'Sri Virodhi nama samvathsara' - Ugadi Habbada ShubhashayagaLu.

Please mark your calenders and listen to a Kannada program where we invite listeners to share with us their opnion about the current Economic situation.

What do you think will be your share of bevu and bella in the new year.?

Call us during the show and tell us how these tough times have affected you and your friends. Phone number to call during the program is 650-723-9010

Date: Wednesday April 1 2009
Time: 7.30 AM PST to 8.30 AM PST
Hosted by: Madhu Krishnamurthy
Radio in SF Bay Area: 90.1 FM KZSU
Listen on the Internet: http://www.itsdiff.com/

In the website at the top left corner please see in red and yellow "To Listen Live Click Below". Choose 128k or 56k based on your internet bandwidth.

You can listen to previous broadcasts by visiting the Kannada archiveshttp://www.itsdiff.com/Kannada.html

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Review: Slum Dog Millionaire (2008)

2009 Feb 12

Movie: Slum Dog Millionare (2008)
Starring: Dev Patel, Anil Kapoor, Frida Pinto
Directed by: Danny Boyle
Music: A. R. Rahman
Photography:

Score: 6.7 out of 10

This movie seems to be THE cross over movie for Indian film industry. A movie set in India with Indian actors has garnered so much attention that it has become a sleeper hit. It has even secured the best picture award at the Golden Globes and now has landed 8 Oscar nominations. With all the hype, it is hard to see it with an open mind. But see it, I did.

The movie starts of with the protagonist a teenager Jamal who is in police custody and is being worked upon (desi style) to make him confess that he cheated in the game show "Who wants to be a millionaire" where he has won Rs 20m. But truth is on Jamal's side and so he keeps on saying that he won because he knew the answers. The Police Inspector becomes curious about Jamal's life and starts to listen to his story.

The story is about 2 slum dwelling orphans. They are Muslims and they lost their mother during the communal riots. They grow up in the slums. In order to feed themselves they do odd jobs and get robbed of their childhood.

They seem to be taking care of themselves when they are offered help by an organization which claims to take care of kids. They take good care of them initially and the kids are taught to sing. It turns out that they blind children by scooping out their eyes using acid. The older brother sees it being done on another hapless boy. He is now asked to bring his brother Jamal so that they can do the same to him.. The 2 brothers pull a swift escape from their captors. They also have a girl who is accompanying them. As they are running away from their captors they jump into a running train but the girl cannot make it. So she is held back by the bad guys.

What follows next is a sequence of trials and tribulations the boys undergo as they do bit jobs to survive. They turn out to be street-smart and become guides at Tourist spots where they look for tips from wealthy foreigners. One incident stands out where an American couple hire Jamal the main character to show them around. But as luck would have it their car wheels gets stolen by slum dwellers when they have gone out to see the sights. A big Indian in some kind of a uniform starts battering the boy putting him down and kicking him. The American couple gets him out of it and the boy says "You wanted to see the real India. See this is it". That one scene said a lot of things.

The younger one - Jamal - is a good one and the older one is made of more bad stuff. So Jamal leaves his brother and grows up to be a tea vendor in a call center company. But he also tries and gets on 'Who wants to be a millionaire.'

What follows from here is some what a typical Bollywood rags to riches story. Where the director Danny Boyle shows a lot of grip is in the early part of Jamal's life. But once the home stretch for the contest starts, it becomes very predictable and does not seem any different from the thousands of Hindi movies we have seen before in which the hero is a driver and falls in love with the rich man's daughter and earns 50 Lakh rupees by winning a boxing match to win her hand. In fact I feel a regular Hindi movie would have had more drama even though Slum Dog shines with the restrain it exhibits.

The exposure of the underbelly of India i.e the slums of Mumbai is well deserved. I do not have any sympathies for the people who think that this movie shows the bad side of India to get an award. Well! that is the truth. What is the point in hiding it.? That does not make the problem go away.

The 3 major actors Dev Patel, Frieda Pinto, Anil Kappoor and Irfan Khan have given good performances. In fact none of the grown up characters have to work hard at acting. There roles do not require any effort. That explains why there is not even one nomination for acting in this movie. But it is the child actors who shine. The director has made an entertaining movie but this is certainly not his best movie. But what matters is what the members of the Motion Picture Academy thought during the months of February and March in 2009. And they thought Slum Dog was a superlative film.

The music is really no big deal. But A R Rahman has been nominated for 3 Oscars. But the 2 song nominations do not deserve them. They have no special musicality even by Bollywood standards. So this is one of the Academy's idiosyncrasies.



I think this should be a 6.7 out of 10.

Review: Water Lillies (French with English subtitles) Naissance des pieuvres

2009 March 17

Score: 7 out of 10

Title: Water Lillies (French with English subtitles) Naissance des pieuvres
Starring: PAuline Acquart, Louise Blachere, Adele Haenel
Written and Directed by: Celine Sciamma

I have tried to give only an abstract without telling the story. Hope you enjoy it as much as I did. We have seen enough of coming off age movies in US with the list including American Pie or Superbad . Mean Girls by Tina Fey explored the dynamics between adolescent females in a college setting. But this little French movie is very ambitious in its desire to explore sexuality of teenage girls. With the backdrop of synchronized swimming classes and competitions this movie plumbs the depths of the psychology of young girls who are stepping into adult hood.

There are 3 girls who have all given fantastic performances. Especially I liked the understated and mysterious portrayal of Floraine by Adele Haenel. But the central role if any could be the girl called Marie who lives with her fat friend Anne. (played by Pauline Acquart and Louise Blachere) I am amazed how much of hidden emotions the young girls can bring to their roles. Pauline and Adele both show their characters even in the way they walk. The movie is funny at times and most of the times sad. Not because of any earthly tragedy but more for the state of mind of teenage girls - how burdened they must be to have to go through all those issues - being popular in the school, wanting boys to notice them even pretending to be an easy-girl while in reality she is anything but. Another impressive thing about the movie is how nuanced its characters are - just as we are crystallizing an opinion about a character we see a more subtle twist which questions our belief - not from a gotcha style - but more for what any human would have done. I am talking of pretenses and exploiting fellow humans - while being completely oblivious to the hurt that is being caused. The swimming pool scenes are like a breath of fresh air.

It is a simple movie with complex emotions. Well directed and Well acted.

I will give it 7 out of 10.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Review: The Frozen River (2008)

2009 March 4

Movie title: Frozen River (2008)
Starring: Melissa Leo, Misty Upham, Charlie McDermot, Gargi Shinde, Rajesh Bose
Written and Directed by: Courtney Hunt
Cinematography: Reed Morano

For a while I had been yearning to see a movie which is set in the snowy north. I am thinking of something like the movie with Billy Bob Thornton. (Can't remember the name - something to do with a Plan). So it was only lucky that Melissa Leo got nominated for the best actress award for Frozen River made me check it out from Netflix.

How do people react to temptations ? Well that depends on what your situation is. You could be a person with hard set values but what happens when you are at that point where the time, place and people will nudge you into doing it. Just that one time ! . As we have heard wise people that once you commit a felony you have to keep doing more to save yourself. It become tragic when you are good person except for that felony. This is the central theme running in Frozen River. It is laid out in the form of a story which involves misery, love, humane qualities and having to face consequences.

Melissa plays a single mother with two boys. They live in a mobile home somewhere in Northern New york state. Her husband just walked out on her and she has to pay the mortgage or they will be put out of their home. She is managing these difficulties with a job in a convenience store. Now that her husband has disappeared she goes looking for him and finds his car parked outside an Indian Casino. While she checking for her husband inside an Indian women takes her husband's car away since the keys were in the car. Melissa follows her in her own car. After some arguing with the Indian, the Indian proposes to buy her car. As it turns out this Indian women is an accomplice a gang which smuggles aliens into US from Canada. She offers Melissa 800 bucks if she goes and meets the gang leader. This leads to Melissa's car being used for smuggling 2 Chinese. Melissa does this because of the money. She resolves not to do it again. But she finds valid reasons to do it again and again and again.

If you think how the border security forces did not catch the answer comes from the Indian woman. "They will not stop you. You are white".

This tale continues and gets tenser and tenser. We struggle when Melissa struggles while making that hard choice. There are no melodramatic elements. Instead there is the universal emotion of humane behavior which includes lie, love, greed and helplessness.

Melissa Leo definitely deserved this Oscar nomination for the lead role. There are many close up shots and she has daringly displayed a very measured and subtle performance. The Indian woman is good too. She has some of the best moments in the movie which are very heart felt. But the 2 boys were very good. Especially the older one who is struggling to accept the fact that his father deserted his mother. He has that anger that it was mom's fault. He has displayed good emotions.

The photography, lighting and music are all very good. The director has told the story without letting it slip her control.

I would give this movie a 7.5 out of 10.

Review: I have loved you so long (French 2008)

2009 March 16

Title: I have loved you so long (2008)(Il y a longtemps que je t'aime)
(French with English Subtitles)
Starring: Kirstin Scott Thomas, Elsa Zylberstein,
Written and Directed by: Phillipe Claudel

When you see a person and get introduced to her by a few tell tale mannerisms of that person you form an opinion. If that person is being closed to the point of being rude then you think you know that she is no good. That is how the movie starts and the person who is at the receiving end of your judgment is the talented British Actor Kristin Scott Thomas. She gives a stellar performance in this beautiful, well crafted and performed French movie about human emotions, life and the twists and turns life brings on the most undeserved and unsuspecting victims. The movie is a great exposition of humanity and love and understanding.

The movies starts with Juliette Fontaine (Kirstin Scott Thomas) waiting in a depressed state in an airport when another young women comes excitedly to receive her and take her home. The beauty of this movie is that it is narrated such that every minute into the movie we learn more about the characters and this has the effect of the characters growing on us. Kirsten plays a woman who has something serious happened to her in life which we will only find out later into the movie. Luca is the young woman who comes to meet her. Since the reader will probably enjoy watching the movie as it unfolds I will try to be very secretive about the plot and the relationships between the various characters. The actress playing Luca has given such a beautiful and tender performance that is hard to say who has given a more noteworthy performance between the 2 leading ladies. I have no hesitation in nominating both for the best female lead actor roles. Elsa Zylberstein disappears into her character and makes the audience understand and imagine her part without really showing herself in her past. Her behavior the present gives the viewer a clue of what she was when she was younger and her relationships with others in the movie.

I was surprised that Kirsten Scott Thomas spoke French. It is a treat to watch her make the audience slide from one feeling to another towards her. She can be sad, she can be joyous and she can be that person who is just transitioning from being to sad to being joyous. Elsa Zylberstein says a lot in how she reacts to Kirsten Scott Thomas. It appears that she is made just for the role in this movie but hopefully that was just he convincing acting. I am sure she is a very versatile actress.

The story offers an excellent plot for good acting and direction. The small town French setting is very pleasant and the various characters we meet are interesting. The director of the movie has handled the subtle theme very well. It is a movie that everyone should watch.

I give this movie 8 out of 10.

Review: The Visitor (2008)

2009 March 1

Title: The Visitor
Starring: Richard Jenkins, Haaz Sleiman, Danain Gurra, Hiam Abbas
Directed by: Thomas McCarthy
Written by: Thomas McCarthy.

This movie caught my attention when the lead character says "I am not busy. I just pretend to be busy". Among things this line what makes the Visitor touch our souls in a very effective manner. I can easily identify with it. I empathise with the character who says that. That should explain why I liked this movie.

The story is of a middle aged College Professor who is a very bored, inexpressive and dour fellow. He is also untalented but drives himself to learn piano unsuccessfully which only adds to his frustration and need for isolating himself. In such a pathetic existence an unexpected even happens which is something he had contemplated in his wildest dreams. Obviously he is incapable of handling it. He has a visitor who is an illegal alien. So what starts of as a cold happenstance between 2 of the most dissimilar characters starts to warm up and in spite of his inability the Richard Jenkins character does things which needs him to reach into the depths of his soul to bring out his passion.

Richard Jenkins gives a good performance. The challenge for him is that his character does not express any feelings. As Terry Gross of Fresh Air put it he has act like the guy who is expressionless and still bring out what is happening inside of him. This is a very nuanced performance as compared to performing a characters which has very distinct and easily identifiable character traits. No wonder Jenkins was nominated for the best. Unfortunately he did not win. Sean Penn's performance in Milk was too good to be surpassed.

A nice movie with good performance by Jenkins, Haaz Sleiman, Danain Gurra and Isreali-Arab actress Hiam Abbas. The director makes sure that the story is well paced. The only surprise was the appearance of the Syrian woman (a Muslim) in a somewhat western outfit. It is not inconceivable but definitely unexpected.

This movie gets a 7.2 on 10.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Obama's inauguration

I was so consumed by the Mumbai attacks that I had lost touch with American Politics. That kept nagging me because here is the most historic occasion in my life time and I am not immersing myself in it. It kept building on itself and I kept postponing the work of updating myself on the preparations going on for the inaugural ceremony. Eventually the day came and I had no choice but to watch it on my TV at home. I say no choice because there were a bunch of events happening to coincide with the ceremony. Santa Clara University had set up a common TV viewing area in the Oradre Commons Library. Off course the ultimate participation would have been to go to Washington DC but practical considerations ruled that out.

The fact that the inauguration was at 12.00 Noon EST helped. It was going to be at 9.00 AM PST in San Jose. I started watching at 8.30 on KQED. I felt that instead of trying to have the perfect historical experience I should just experience it the way it turns out without regretting the lack of the ultimate satisfaction or bragging rights to say "I was there and it happened right in front of my eyes."

It was pretty good time when I started. Former Presidents George Bush Senior, Carter, George W, Bill Clinton and their first ladies were walking up to the podium from inside The Capitol. It was all stage managed and their arrivals were being announced. The crowd sprawled for at least half a mile from the center stage and people were waving flags and Obama memorabilia.

After George W entered with his cheerful wife Laura, Vice President Elect Joe Biden walked in beaming. He seems like a jovial guy in spite of his tough reputation. Then came Michelle Obama, her mother and her two daughters.

Finally the man of the moment Barack Obama came in view of the TV. He was not yet announced since he was still in the hall way and not out in the public. I felt that he was very sombre. It appeared that he was humbled by a couple of things. That he had achieved such a great distinction as being elected to be the most powerful person in the world, that he was elected not by people of color alone but by a majority of white voters and that he was getting into office at a time when America faced one of its toughest challenges. There was the bleak economic situation to contend with. There was the Iraq war which had not gone well for US and there was the contentious issue of whether or not to pull out of Iraq. Then there was the Afghan war which has started to go against the US. Finally the threat of international terrorism hangs quite low on the President of the US. While some commentators had predicted that he does not have the charisma of a FDR or JFK and felt Obama's sombre performance at the inaugural justified their views, I actually felt confident hearing Obama address the issues the way he did. I wanted to parse his speech and analyze it but I realized if I waited for that I will for ever postpone recording my thoughts.

Coming back to the lack of a JFK/FDR appeal I actually felt nothing but a sense of "off course he will get off to a good start and he will not fail". I did wonder if this confidence was just my lack of critical evaluation of Obama who seems to have awed me with his journey. Let us see what all happened that could have easily tripped him and ambushed his journey.

Firstly he was black, born to a foreigner, had a Muslim name, grew up in Indonesia. He overcame all these seemingly insurmountable obstacles. This should have been an indication that other obstacles would pale in front of these sensitive issues. But still in American Elections a candidate can fall from popularity right at the last moment. So to complete the list here are some hiccups which he overcame that only made me admire and be inspired by Obama more, because his stature was such that people simply ignored these possible negative issues. Issues which could have pulled down a candidate of lesser personality that Obama. I am talking of the Dr. Jeremiah Wright episode. Obama opponents tried to dub him as an America hater because his pastor Jeremiah Wright had given incendiary speech about race relations in America. Then there was the comment about how the Blue collar white American is bitter because their good life is disappearing. Michelle herself contributed to the mix by saying "I felt proud of America for the first time" when Obama was successful in gaining the Democratic nomination.

Equally importantly there was Hillary Clinton who was also a Democratic aspirant. She conducted a tough campaign in which she questioned Obama's competence, experience and readiness. Her low evaluation of Obama was used by McCain and the Republicans to smear Obama. There was Sarah Palin's remark about his lack of executive experience. Bill Clinton threw himself as one of the roadblocks to Obama when he said "Obama should realize this is not a fairy tale".

It should be mentioned that the dip in the financial and economic health of US helped Obama's candidacy since he represented a change from the last eight years. His opponent McCain represented the continuation of the same.

Now Obama overcame all those obstacles and won preliminaries after preliminaries and state after state in the final election to land a convincing victory. It is this feeling that he has endured so many tests to emerge successful that makes me feel this President is really made up of solid stuff. His oratory skills, his Harvard qualification, his appealing family image and his calm and composed demeanor only burnishes his image.

I heard an interview on NPR yesterday where an African American journalist put it very well. He was asked what he thought of Martin Luther King Jr since he was growing up at that time when Dr. King was active. He said that when he was a boy he did not like Dr. King's civil disobedience movement. He felt it was cowardly. He felt rage when he saw the black activists being beaten up and thrown in jails. But later he realized that the message from King was that "White people also feel that ill treating black people is wrong. A white man may not like his daughter to marry a black man but he certainly has the capacity to cringe when he sees black people being mistreated." This according to the journalist was a leap of faith on Dr. King's part to believe in the goodness of humans who happen to belong on the oppressor's side. He said this is what he saw in Obama. Obama was capable of seeing the good side of all Americans including the White majority. It was this reaching out on the part of Obama that gave him unbelievable victories in Indiana, Ohio, Virginia and such states.

It is apt that the inauguration happened just a day after Martin Luther King day.

I am not sure how many people feel or realize the effects of Obama's election to the Presidency of the most powerful nation. Obama has shown that there is no handicap that can stop anyone from achieving their dreams. It will inspire a Dalit in India to aspire for greater leadership roles. It will open the eyes of US haters to the good effects of freedom and democracy which US not only preaches but practices to full conviction. A person with a Muslim name can be the President of a Christian nation! That should shame many of the groups in the world who easily incite hatred by calling US the villain of the world, who believe in categorizing people as us and them to further their own narrow objectives.

With Obama's open and consultative style the community of nations will believe in American leadership. I found Obama's call to the world community to unite and fight against the global issues like poverty, under nourished children and terrorism, very hopeful.

After the inaugural speech the commentators kept judging Obama's speech as lacking in crowd enthusing catch phrases like "Do not ask what your country can do for you...". But for me the most recollectible statement was when he told the evil forces in the world that their terror tactics cannot threaten Americans. That we are strong and we will defeat you. Wow! What a thought . "Terrorists defeated". I think it is possible.

Go for it Obama. I wish you receive the goodwill and support from the citizens of the world.